Dear Readers,
Here are my ideas.
TENNIS:
This is one of the most unfair sports there is. Somebody
like Argentinean Diago Schwartzman at 1.7 m tall is expected to play on equal
terms for the same prize money against somebody like that American giant John Isner
at 2.8 m. It’s a game where the taller you are the more likely you are to be
able to serve unplayable aces, which is something the little players are seldom
able to do in what is the most important part of the game. In other individual
sports like boxing and weight lifting competition is evened out by dividing
competitors into weight categories, effectively making size nothing like the
advantage it is in tennis.
I believe only ONE
SERVE should be allowed. Currently the serve is the only time in tennis
when a player has two chances to get the ball in play and as this is the aspect
of the game that is so much in favour of tall players restricting it to one
shot would help to even the odds. The big servers would then have to be much
more circumspect knowing that they can no longer just blast away as hard as
they can to begin with as they would no longer have two chances to get it
right.
There should be no LETS
(when a served ball hits the top of the net, goes over and still lands in).
At the moment if a player hits a ball that clips the top of the net and it goes
over and in during normal play they win the point if it is not returned
successfully. So why should it be any different for the service.
The number of times a server can bounce the ball before hitting
it should be restricted to TWO. It
really is a pain in the but watching the likes of Novak Djokovic bounce the
ball seemingly forever before serving.
Abolish ADVANTAGE. When
the score reaches Deuce (40-40) the
winner of the next point should take the game. At the moment games can become
very tedious bouncing between Deuce
and Ad and back again.
(Jailed for bankruptcy offences)
GOLF:
Golfers spend far too much time fiddling with their balls
on the greens. Place marking and picking up of balls on the greens should be
abolished. Here are some other changes that I believe would make the game more
exciting and watchable.
Players should have to play in the same order that they start
a hole until they hole out. If they find they are snookered by another person’s
ball when it’s their turn to put on the green they would have to either knock
it out of they way with their put or go round it. It would make play on the
greens a lot more interesting.
Lifting of dents made by balls landing on the greens to
smooth them out should no longer be allowed.
INTERNATIONAL RUGBY
has become a game of aimless kicking away of possession, brawn and very little
skill. Passing the ball beyond two players is an increasing rarity. As this win
at all costs style of play appears to have been developed by the SPRINGBOKS when they won the last World
Cup everybody else is doing much the same thing. A lot more should be done to
promote a running, passing type of game.
To encourage try scoring the points for a TRY should be increased to 7 with 3 for a conversion. Penalties should only count for 2 points. BOX KICKING should be banned completely and when the ball comes out
of any kind of scrum it should have to be passed through the hands of at least
two players before it can be kicked.
There should be no more penalties or free kicks at set
scrums unless foul play is involved. The ref should just let these go on even
if they develop into a loose scrum until one side or the other gets the ball.
At the moment they are so regulated they destroy the flow of the game and often
result in penalties, which are the dreariest part of what is supposed to a
running, try scoring sport.
INTERNATIONAL
PLAYERS of today have forgotten that RUGBY
was started by William Webb Ellis when he picked up the ball during a football
match at
This is exactly the attitude the Springboks seem to
have adopted.
How many males sporting codes have women as managers or
coaches? My bet is there is a handful, if any. Wayde van Niekerk
Men should be banned from being managers or coaches in any kind
of women’s sport. I can’t understand why women have no yet campaigned for
something like this. All kinds of female sports from hockey to tennis and a
host of others have men as coaches. The South African women’s cricket team has
had a man as a coach (appointed by men no doubt) for 10 years and he was far
from being a major star in his playing days. It’s hardly surprising then that
the team hasn’t exactly excelled under his leadership.
“The tennis ball doesn’t know how old I am. The ball doesn’t know if I’m man or a woman or if I come from a communist country or not. Sport has always broken down these barriers” – Martina Navratilova
What to do think of my ideas?
Regards,
Jon,
an Armchair Sportsman of note.
No comments:
Post a Comment