Dear Readers,
Murray Norton |
Is presenting at the BBC a breeding ground for cyber-bullies?
At last one of them has been
jailed and this should also have happened to Murray Norton 10 years earlier. This most
cowardly of crimes was what led to the death of my son Simon Abbott, but although Norton, the culprit, was actually working for the BBC at the
time no action was taken against him.
Now Alex Belfield a former BBC
radio presenter has been given a five year sentence in
After
25 years in broadcasting Alex found himself in Covid Lockdown and this prompted him
to start “The Voice of Reason” on You Tube from his mother’s backroom bedroom.
A year later he had 236 million hits as the
Alex Belfield |
For
some inexplicable reason this success was not enough for him, so he made an
even bigger name for himself by going after four people, including fellow
broadcasters.
He was convicted of harassing them
online by posting social media messages, sending emails and encouraging the
followers of his You Tube channel to target them.
One
of his victims was Jeremy Vine, a popular TV and radio presenter. According to
the Judge he made “wholly false” allegations of theft against Vine. Bernard
Spedding another BBC presenter received death threats and had come close to
committing suicide, the court was told.
Murray Norton’s “vicious and unrelenting cyber-bullying” campaign against Simon on the island of Jersey where Norton had a long history of working as a BBC presenter was similar or probably worse than what Belfield did. Norton was hosting a daily three hour show on Radio Jersey at the time. His attacks on Simon were made particularly personal because he had a photographer accomplice to snatch pictures of Simon that they put on Twitter and possibly elsewhere. To make matters worse this was not long after the death of his sister in extremely tragic circumstances, which Norton was well aware of.
My
son was a self employed software developer living in Jersey when my daughter
and his only sibling 41 year old Samantha Abbott jumped to her death from a car park
building in
In
memory of his sister Simon established a Trust in
As
the
Norton was said to have posted comments
on Facebook and Twitter accusing Simon of being a con-man who was just
collecting donations for himself. The Police however, could find no evidence of
this. And because of Norton’s standing
on the
After my son’s death Norton went on to become a Minister in the Jersey Government before being appointed Chief Executive Office of the Jersey Chamber of Commerce.
A
cyber-bulling ball takes some stopping once a VIP like Norton gets it going. He
effectively scuppered any chance
Simon had of raising money for his Trust which was properly registered in
He
listed more than 20 of them he claimed had given him clothes to sell and
these included people like David & Victoria Beckham, Naomi Campbell,
Elle McPherson, Rebecca Adlington (Double Olympic Gold Medalist, Swimming),
Usain Bolt (Triply Olympic Gold Medalist, Sprinting) and so on.
The
most inexplicable side of this story was that before Norton began his vile
social media attacks the BBC Jersey’s website carried a glowing report about
Simon’s Fashion Show idea together with a list of the celebrity donors.
Simon took Norton's behaviour up with Jon Gripton head of the BBC in
I
also complained to Gripton after Simon’s death when I was unaware that my son
had earlier done something similar. I conducted my own long distance
investigation across half the world from
Simon claimed to have been assaulted by Le Sueur and another person as a result of Norton’s harassment, but he could not get the Police to take any action against the people involved. Norton had lured Simon to a meeting in an empty church to enable Le Sueur to secretly snatch a picture of him which Le Sueur then use to illustrate abusive posts he put on Twitter using the profile name Fashion Juice.
On 6th
February 2012 Simon sent a desperate email to his advocate saying: “Ian Le
Sueur has spent the whole week-end spamming Twitter with my picture saying I’m
a conman, conning items out of celebs and duping people out of hard earned
money.” Simon estimated that these tweets could have been seen by as many as
500 000 people.
Gripton
initially told me that he received Simon’s complaint in October 2011 and he
added, “I then made Norton aware of his responsibilities as a freelance working
for the BBC, stressed the need for
impartiality and reiterated the need to bear this in mind in any dealings in
his personal social media or indeed
elsewhere."
What
he told me next reflected badly on the BBC. “I was of course aware of his
postings on his private Facebook page, but felt, following my investigations, that
this was not a matter for the BBC.”
When I complained that he could not be described an impartial judge Gripton passed the case up the line to David Holdsworth: Controller, English Regions, BBC News. By this time Leo Divine, the BBC Regional Head had sided with Gripton after Simon had complained to him when he got not joy from Gripton.
Holdsworth supported his underlings. He found there was no evidence that “Murray Norton had engaged in or incited cyber-bullying on either the BBC or his personal accounts, or on public websites.” He added that he believed the investigations were properly done.What he said next made nonsense of his claim that Norton had not taken part in cyber-bulling Simon.
“Divine
spoke to Norton, who had ceased posting any comments about Simon Abbott in
October 2011, after your son had complained, and confirmed that he would not be
posting further comments.”
Norton
was doing nothing wrong in the BBC’s eyes yet he suddenly stops doing it when
Simon complains. But even then he did not stop because in November 2011 he
fired off another salvo at Simon on his Facebook page. “The Police and the
press and possibly the taxation authorities must be sent all complaints with
hard evidence that Simon has actually done something wrong. Simon, if you are
watching this -which my friends, he might be – give it up; come clean on the
finances of the Trust. Put the items you claim to have from the famous to good
use. I’ll auction them for some people in real need instead of fake events that
help no one, even those of us trying to raise funds.”
This was a page lead on October 13, 2013 in Britain's The Mail on Sunday, the Sunday Newspaper of the Year in 2019 with a circulation of 800 000 |
The
BBC’s final whitewash job on Norton was conducted by the BBC Trust, which is
the governing body of the British Broadcasting Corporation. It agreed to
consider my appeal against the decision of the three BBC top executives who
ruled that Norton had not engaged in or incited cyber-bulling against Simon.
I
was told an independent Editorial Adviser would be appointed to investigate the
case and produce a report to aid the BBC’s Editorial Standards Committee that
would consider my appeal. I was to be given the report to comment on and this
would form part of the final document.
The stink of bias arose because they refuse to name the Adviser, leaving me with the uncomfortable feeling that he/she was a BBC lackey.The fishy business didn’t end there, it got worse. In the Adviser’s report, references to information that would be given to the Committee, but not shared with the parties to protect the privacy of the individuals involved kept cropping up. This was the reason given for only giving the Police statement to the Committee.
The
people who were interviewed by the adviser were listed but nowhere was my name
mentioned even though I could easily have been contacted in
The Adviser’s bias really showed when
under a ‘Confidential’ heading he/ she stated: “The News Editor of the Jersey
Evening Post (the Island’s only paper) told me that he thought
When the final version of the Committee’s findings arrived for publication that recurring theme that some of the wording ‘has been amended to protect the privacy of the individuals concerned’ cropped up again. Not a single person was named in the final report. Even my son and I were referred to as Complainants 1 and 2 and Norton was an anonymous BBC radio presenter.
The
Committee of five rejected my appeal and accepted the very convoluted arguments
of the BBC’s department heads and emptied the rest of its whitewash onto the
BBC for acting in good faith and dealing fairly with both complainants.
The
Trustee members of the Committee who dealt with the appeal were; Alison
Hastings (Chairperson), Sonita Alleyne, Richard Ayre, Bill Matthews and
Nicholas Prettejohn. They were not named in the findings. I had to establish
their identities myself.
If this is the BBC’s idea of justice
it badly needs help because it is appalling to say the least. It was like what could happen in some secret society.
Regards,
Jon, who only wishes he could
have been in
No comments:
Post a Comment