Dear Readers,
To be diagnosed with the
BIG C is everybody's nightmare. Below is something I took off Twitter and when I sent it to
my brother Anthony what
follows is his reply.
BIG C is everybody's nightmare. Below is something I took off Twitter and when I sent it to
my brother Anthony what
follows is his reply.
“Yes they put him in
jail for selling them as a cancer cure. You
chew the kernel of apricot pips. When
a Japanese Doctor at Sloan
Kettering Cancer research in the US
they repressed his research because it was not a patentable method. When a marshal arts champ used them to cure himself of cancer and then starting
selling them as a cure they put him in jail.
A
study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association revealed
that 15 million cancer cases were diagnosed in 2013. This disease was also
responsible for 15 per cent of the deaths in the 118 countries included in the
research. It was hardly surprising then that the global market for oncology drugs
rose 10.3 per cent in 2014 and may reach US$147 billion by
2018 according to IMS Health, an American company that services the healthcare
industry with information.
The discrepancy between perception and reality has convinced people like
Linus Pauling, biochemist, two-time Nobel Prize winner and one of the 20
greatest scientists of all time that “most cancer research is largely a fraud.”
Sadly, he is not the only expert to claim that cancer research is a
fraud; Collective Evolution has amassed a list of professionals who claim
cancer has not been cured yet because the attempt to find a solution to this
growing problem is nothing more than a hoax. For instance, Dr. Marcia Angell,
long-time editor of the New England Medical Journal, stated that “it is simply
no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published”
while Dr. John Bailer, who spent two decades on the staff of the U.S. National
Cancer Institute, concluded that “the national cancer program must be judged a
qualified failure.” In fact, he claimed that the institution’s “whole cancer
research in the past 20 years has been a total failure.”
In 1981, the Sloan-Kettering Cancer Research Institute’s former director
Dr Irwin Bross concluded that the animal model studies are useless, because
practically all of the chemotherapeutic agents that are valuable in the
treatment of human cancer were not found in animal studies, but in a clinical
context. The corporate side of treating this illness cannot be ignored any
longer, as spending on cancer medicines has hit a new milestone of US$100
billion in 2014.
Lancet’s Editor-in-Chief Richard Horton said in the medical journal’s
April 15, 2015 edition that “much of the scientific literature, perhaps half,
may simply be untrue,” while Dr John P.A. Ioannidis, professor in disease
prevention at Stanford University wrote in a 2005 article titled Why Most Published Research Findings Are False that “there is increasing
concern that the most current published research findings are false.”
According to Cancer Research- A
Super Fraud? by Robert Ryan, B.Sc, most cancer is preventable. The
International Agency for Research in Cancer found that 80 to 90 per cent of
human cancer “is determined environmentally,” which makes it avoidable.
However, medical historian Hans Ruesch concluded that “less than ten per cent
of the [U.S.
In the late 1970s, investigative reporters Gary Null and Robert Houston
wrote that “a solution to cancer would mean the termination of research
programs and it would mortally threaten the present clinical establishments.”
Dr Robert Sharpe has added that “treating disease is enormously profitable,
preventing it is not.”
It is much worse than it is mentioned here. They are NOT looking for a
cure. Revenue from cancer treatments will be lost from so many medical
facilities; pharmaceutical companies; Food and Drug Administration fees charge
to fund the new drug approval process; or better still ‘payoffs’ for ‘approved’
cancer drugs will dry up and money from lobbyists to the corrupt politicians
would stop. Too much money and jobs would be lost IF cancer is cured!”
Anthony’s Comments:
This is worse than what went on in Nazi Germany. I am sure many Germans
were not aware just as many in the U s of A are similarly oblivious, because
the U s of A is an economy built on a house of cards - oil revenues channelled
through their banks - arms manufacturing - dollar no longer supported by gold -
a free licence to print money etc etc profits on medicine out of proportion to
manufacturing costs.
Rewind to Welsley:
Many people know John Wesley was the inspiration behind the Methodist
Denomination. But few know he was one of the first persons in England
He recommended electricity as a cure for over twenty illnesses. It was
one of his favourite remedies and he said it was "far superior to all the
medicines I know."
In November, 1756, he obtained an electrical apparatus and began
experimenting by shocking himself for lameness and neuralgia. The cure was
certain but gradual. His Journal records at least two other occasions where he
applied electrical shock therapy to himself, once when he was 70 and once when
he was 80 years old.
Successful cures from Wesley's Desideratum
- Electricity Made Plain and Useful
“William Jones, a Plaisterer...fell from a Scaffold on Thursday, Feb.15 last.
He was grievously bruised, both outwardly and inwardly, and lay in violent pain
utterly helpless, till Saturday in the afternoon, when he was brought (carried)
by two men to be electrified. After a few minutes he walk'd home alone, and on
Monday went to work.
“Sarah Guilford, aged 37 was for upwards of seven years so afflicted
with rheumatism in her right side, that the knee and the ankle were wasted
exceedingly. January 2d last she was electrified, and perfectly cured in one day.
But it threw her into a profuse sweat, particularly from those parts which had
been most affected.
“Abigail Brown, aged 22 electrified five days successively, having one wire
applied to the fore part, another to the hinder part of the head, and receiving
seven or eight shocks each Time. Hereby she was entirely cured, nor has found
any pain in her head since, unless occasionally for want of sleep.
“A man, fifty-seven years old, who had been deaf for thirty-two years,
was so relieved in a few days, as to hear tolerably well, etc., etc .,etc.,
etc.
He asserts that
electricity for healing is the intent of God, the creator:
‘I do not know of
any remedy under heaven that is likely to do you so much good as the being
constantly electrified. But it will not avail unless you persevere therein for
some time.”
Wesley believed that the emotions of the mind are capable of bringing
about changes in the body. When the mind experiences disturbing emotions, the
whole body responds in 'sympathy.' The medical men despised Wesley and his
work. Their contempt was probably due to the fact that Wesley was not
qualified, did not charge for his services, and was hugely successful.
He said that if society had to wait on the physicians to try electrical
healing, society would wait in vain. Physicians were too committed to making
money by prescribing complex medications for which they charged much money.
According to Wesley, physicians would not be interested in such a
simple, cheap treatment as electrification until they had more regard for the
interests of their neighbours than their own. At least not till there are no
more apothecaries in the land or till physicians are independent of them. (Why
does this sound so familiar? And that was some 250 years ago. Repeat for
those sleeping or with selective hearing problems.) He said that if society had
to wait on the physicians to try electrical healing, society would wait in
vain. Physicians were too committed to making money by prescribing complex
medications for which they charged much money.
The tradition continued in modern times in various forms confirming
Wesley’s claims – yet the Flexner report sponsored by the Rockefeller and
Carnegie Foundations, intent on steering all medicine towards drug based
solutions debunked the electrical approach from as early as 1910 when the
report first appeared.
It's all about money.
A.A.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcE46IH9LmQ This is part of "Cancers the forbidden cures" on Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcE46IH9LmQ This is part of "Cancers the forbidden cures" on Youtube
Regards,
Jon, a Consumer
Watchdog who could not agree more with my brother’s comments that the drug
business is not essentially about curing people it is more about making money.
P.S. According to Anthony the kernels of apricot pips
contain cyanide in a special form which seeks out the cancer tumours and
eliminates them. Unlike arsenic cyanide does not build up in the body. For
cancer he says, “You start slowly with 3 pips and then as the body gets used to
them you build up the numbers and frequency of doses. You might feel a little
dizzy at first but nobody it seems has killed themselves except some kids in Turkey
* I contacted the Wellness Warehouse in Kloof Street , Cape
Town
