In your Sunday Times
column this week you proposed an idyllic solution to what you describe as South
Africa’s “single most pressing social threat - land.”
You told us that “everyone knows South African capitalism
is Victorian. It makes only a few people rich.”
You are making us out to be unique. Isn’t that what happens
all over the world, whatever system is in place?
After
first telling us that capitalism is the only answer “to poverty and inequality
because it creates wealth” you suggested remedies that are the antithesis of
capitalism.
(If anybody knows how well capitalism works it's Warren
Handouts never made anybody rich except for those who
corrupt the system. They certainly don’t encourage people to work hard and make
a prosperous life for themselves.
Your idea is to give every person who has nothing a 1000 sq
m plot from the country’s unused land, as close to “an existing town or city as
possible.” Imagine the in fighting and bribery there would be to get the plots next
to the big cities like Johannesburg , Cape Town and Durban .
A further complication would be that the value of the plots would vary
enormously and a lot of well off people would suddenly claim to be poor.
Your other pie in the sky idea is to have R20 000 deposited
into a bank account in the name of every child born. The money would then be
invested by our asset managers for “at least a 10% return” until the child
could access it at the age of 21.
Anybody
who has had a retirement annuity where they are forced by law to have the money
looked after by an insurance company will know how much the returns suffer from
the amounts that are creamed off in fees. Mine has grown well short of 10% in
the last 10 years.
You go on to say that about 1.1 million people are born
every year and by the time the first children turn 21 there would be more than
R20-trillion in the kitty. You add more wishful thinking with, “The state would
claim its investment back from their estates when they die.”
Much
like the current student loans scheme, no doubt, where they are supposed to
repay their loans once they have a job, but many don’t bother and the
Government doesn’t make much effort to collect what is due either.
“We would never have to entertain a ratings agency ever again,” you claim.
It’s as simple as that. Only you don’t say where all this
money would come from; where you would find the people honest enough to look
after it for all those years and so on.
Your Communist type, master plan would produce different
“pressing social threats,” like protests from people who urgently need their
money paid before they reach 21. Then
too we would have abandoned plots of land all over the place in areas where
people don’t want to live.
You also told us that your dream scheme depended on the
impossible, certainly in South
Africa that is …. “clean, efficient
government and brave politicians to make it happen.”
The real answer surely is to reform the capitalist system
itself. It can’t last in its present form where so few people have more money
than the rest put together.
There should be a ceiling on wealth. And once that ceiling
is reached you pay say 90% of your income in tax.
Of
course that will never happen because the power is in the hands of the rich.
A French Revolution type revolt is the only way to placate
the destitute and give the rich the fright they need. But that won’t solve
anything either as most people, particularly the masses, will then be far worse
off than they were before.
It wouldn’t be long before man’s greed would produce a new
crop of super rich once again.
Can you
imagine Julius Malema and his cronies choosing to ride around in an old bakkie
instead of a top of the range Mercedes Benz or BMW if your plan became a
reality?
Thanks Bruce for this idea that was no doubt conceived to
convey the message that the Sunday Times has the welfare of the poor of our
country at heart. It was a bit of light hearted reading on a par with Zapiro’s
cartoon which was on the same page. Luckily the poor can’t afford to buy your
paper otherwise they might soon be clogging our cities with marches when they don’t
get their free bit of land.
Regards
Jon
P.S. Note
to readers: Apart from being a regular SundayTimes
columnist Bruce is also Editor-in-Chief of Business Day and the Financial
Mail in Johannesburg ,
so he won’t be needing a free plot. He’s already a very healthy CAPITALIST. But no doubt any additions to his immediate or
extended family would qualify for that R20 000 nest egg.
No comments:
Post a Comment